Home | News | Safety | Swimming Pool Fire Hose a Miss With Pool Pros

A swimming pool fire hose recently featured on the hit TV show Shark Tank looks like a big miss with pool and fire safety professionals. High Pressure Suction Hose

The FireFighter1 swimming pool fire hose is a product that made its way onto the popular TV show Shark Tank, where entrepreneurs pitch their ideas to a panel of investors in hopes of securing a deal. The FireFighter1 swimming pool fire hose was a hit on the show and ended up winning over the Sharks, resulting in a successful investment. Whether or not the product will become a hit with consumers, however, remains to be seen.

The FireFighter1 system is ostensibly a fire hose designed for swimming pools. The average residential swimming pool has around 25,000 gallons of water and the FireFighter1 claims that it can deploy more than a gallon of water per second, in a controlled spray that can reach up to 40 feet.

The product claims to offer homeowners the ability to quickly extinguish small fires that may occur around the pool area. The kit comes with a hose available in 50 and 100-ft lengths as well a 3-way diverter.

One of the primary features touted in the pitch for the FireFighter1 System is its high-pressure nozzle. Manufacturers claim the nozzle is able to produce a powerful stream of water that can effectively extinguish small fires. The hose also comes with a built-in shut-off valve, allowing users to easily control the flow of water.

Another key selling feature of the FireFighter1 swimming pool fire hose is its compact size. The hose can be easily stored in a pool shed or other small space, making it readily available in the event of a fire.

On the surface, the system seems like a no-brainer for pool owners who live in areas prone to wildfires. So why are pool industry professionals saying that they’re ready to give this product a hard pass?

Swimming pools and ponds are frequently utilized by fire departments. Typically helicopters are deployed to use the water to combat wildfires. One could argue, doesn’t a product like FireFighter1 make sense for consumers to have in their homes?

Clearly, the product is targeting homeowners who live in rural areas with fewer available resources to respond to house fires and potential wildfires. This was the premise of the value proposition on Shark Tank. The product however is raising alarms both with pool industry professionals and fire safety experts who feel that the equipment being pitched to the public is inadequate in the face of real-world wildfires.

“I think it will sell. People will buy into it, especially in drought-stricken areas prone to fires. I do think it will work to a certain point if installed correctly – not as in the demo. It needs to be on the discharge of the pump. I don’t think most homeowners will know to change the suction to draw from the main drain versus the skimmer and they will run out of water. I do think it will provide a false sense of security and keep people from evacuating as early as they should. All in all, I’m not a fan.” – CPO Instructor & Best-Selling Author, Rudy Stankowitz.

“There’s not enough water volume. We have a detail/spec for a fire department standpipe off of a dedicated pool main drain for firefighting. It’s a 6” main line to a 4” vertical pipe for a wharf hydrant. It’s a detail that we’ve had approved by the CDF, LA, Santa Barbara & Monterey County Fire Marshals,” Paolo Benedetti – Swimming Pool Expert Witness.

Wildfire prevention and mitigation expert, James Rappuhn feels this product may actually be dangerous in the long run. “I do not feel this is a good solution for homeowners. It creates a false sense of security (“I don’t need to perform necessary home hardening or clearance because I have this pool pump system”). Additionally, wildfires move faster than people know. They should be evacuating to safety not staying home and fighting a fire with inferior equipment. To me, this is a dangerous product. I base this on 20 years of wildfire experience.”

There are numerous threads on social media dedicated to whether or not this is a viable product for consumers. The general consensus among pool professionals and fire safety experts we spoke with is that consumers may have difficulty engaging the system in an emergency and that the flow rate may not be suited to the task of fighting an actual wildfire.

Bianca Wittenberg is the founder of FireFighter1 and current CEO and Lead Product Developer. On the surface, it does not appear that she has much pool or fire safety experience. She owns a residential real estate company called Own It Real Estate and is an operations manager and broker at IBMC Lending. Prior to starting FireFighter1, she owned a synthetic lawn and landscaping business.

Experts we spoke to would like to see more involvement from independent sources both in the pool industry as well as fire safety to ascertain whether or not this product is actually a safer alternative to simply evacuating.

Shark Tank has a history of finding great new products, especially when it comes to pool-related items. One such product that was a big hit was Magic 5, which made a splash with its innovative custom-tailored swim goggles. Sometimes the sharks hit, and sometimes they miss. This certainly wouldn’t be the first fire safety product that went awry for the sharks. For now, however, it’s safe to say that FireFighter1 appears to be a big miss with pool pros.

Drowning Facts – Have We Hit a Crisis Point in America?

Editor in Chief of Pool Magazine - Joe Trusty is also CEO of PoolMarketing.com, the leading digital agency for the pool industry. An internet entrepreneur, software developer, author, and marketing professional with a long history in the pool industry. Joe oversees the writing and creative staff at Pool Magazine. To contact Joe Trusty email [email protected] or call (916) 467-9118 during normal business hours. For submissions, please send your message to [email protected]

Online Retailers Are Leveling The Playing Field in 2023

New Pool Products To Check Out in 2022

Magic 5 Swim Goggles Are The Wave of the Future

Heritage Pool Supply Group Joins Pool Industry as Distributor

Pool Products: Concrete Countertop Solutions Products Will Help You Grow Your Business

Drowning rates increased during the pandemic and experts agree we may have hit a crisis point.

The issue of drowning prevention and mitigating pool-related fatalities go hand-in-hand. According to the Consumer Product Safety Commission’s (CPSC) annual drowning report, fatal child drownings and nonfatal drowning injuries in children under the age of 15 remain high and nonfatal drownings spiked by 17% in 2021.

The World Health Organization says that drowning is the leading cause of unintentional deaths worldwide, with over 372,000 deaths reported each year. 140,000 of those deaths were children.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, nearly 4,000 people die in the United States yearly from drowning. Drowning is the second leading cause of death for children after birth defects. An average of three children die each day from drowning, and it is the second leading cause of accidental deaths in children aged 1-14, right behind motor vehicle-related deaths.

An average of 379 children under age 15 die in reported drownings linked to pools or spas each year, according to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, and the statistic has been climbing in the United States.

During 2018–2019, unintentional drowning deaths totaled 73 for those under age 1 year, 821 for ages 1–4, 390 for ages 5–13, and 270 for ages 14–17, (CDC). Most drownings in residential swimming pools happen among children ages 1–4. 74% of fatal pool accidents occurred at residential locations.

Texas leads the nation in childhood drownings. 67% of swimming pool drowning deaths involved children younger than 3 years old. In swimming pools, black children ages 10-14 years drown at rates 7.6 times higher than white children. Black children are more likely to drown in public pools, and white children are more likely to drown in residential pools according to the CDC.

In 2015, a study conducted by the National Safety Council showed most states were significantly behind in their grading scale.

The NSC study made specific recommendations on what states needed to do. They provided recommendations to make the grade:

The media in 2015 called on states to reduce the number of drowning fatalities. To date, most of the country still has not adopted the recommended guidelines set forth by the NSC. Experts like Dr. Katchmarchi, Executor Director of the NDPA (National Drowning Prevention Alliance), believe we’ve hit a crisis point. “Starting in 2020 we saw a very significant increase. The scary part is when we just look at the numbers, it’s hard to say if that’s a new trend we’re seeing because of the pandemic.”

Katchmarchi is sounding the alarm because a spike in drownings may have a direct provable correlation with current events. “In 2020 we saw drowning rates increase significantly for the first time in a very long time,” said Katchmarchi, “Some of the initial data we’re getting for 2021, has me even more scared.”

Public health experts say water safety should be a priority since nearly all drowning deaths are preventable. “These deaths do not have to occur. It really is something we should be ashamed of and be energized to address,” said Shannon Frattaroli, Director of Johns Hopkins Center for Injury Research and Policy. 

“Most state and local health departments are chronically underfunded for accident prevention in general and many have no expertise in drowning prevention,” said Richard Hamburg, Executive Director of Safe States Alliance.

As it pertains to drowning prevention, laws are slowly being passed to help establish better standards. The Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act (VGBA) is law of the land in the United States. This was a major achievement for federal intervention.

It’s a fact that drowning remains a leading killer in children and young adults. In most cases, states lack the laws and regulations that experts in the field of drowning prevention say are necessary. Experts say more effort from states is required to effectively reduce the rate of fatalities. Existing laws on the books tend to be inconsistent even within neighboring jurisdictions.

More than two hundred national and local groups and state agencies, including the American Red Cross, the YMCA, and the California Highway Patrol, wrote to Congress in March. They called the increase in drownings a “silent crisis” that needed government leadership and funding.

Additional research on drowning prevention measures is needed in order to make a serious impact according to Dr. Katchmarchi, “There’s not a lot that is evidence-based. We’ve been saying to use barriers and alarms. We have some data to support that we know barriers are effective at reducing drowning. Some studies have suggested that it’s up to a 50% decrease with young children but we need better data. When it comes to alarms, we have pretty much no data to support how effective alarms are. We think they are but so far as being able to say adding an alarm will decrease the potential of drowning by X%, we simply don’t have that data.”

Katchmarchi says more focus is needed on developing the National Water Safety Action Plan. “This is designed to impact the community, county, state, and federal level when it comes to water safety. This was in response to a call from the World Health Organization for nations to have a national plan addressing drowning, ” said Katchmarchi.

Drowning prevention studies are essential to our water safety goals in this country. A number of unquantified factors in recent years may have contributed to an increase in drowning fatalities. Drowning prevention is clearly a moving target where the numbers equate to American lives, not just statistics.

What is perhaps most unsettling about all of this data is that change doesn’t appear to be happening quickly enough. It’s disconcerting that given the recent rise in drowning deaths, public pools continue to close at an alarming rate. It’s alarming that a lack of funding for research, lifeguards, and public pools may be erasing the gains our nation has made in previous decades. That we’re struggling to keep up with other developed nations should be a national embarrassment according to water safety experts.

“I was part of the U.S. delegation in 2017 that attended the world conference on drowning prevention, what was quite embarrassing was that the United States was the only developed nation that did not have a water safety action plan,” explained Dr. Katchmarchi, “We hadn’t even started developing it at that point. When you look at other developed nations, we’re compared to Australia, New Zealand, Great Britain, and Canada but the biggest difference is their federal governments take a much more active role in water safety.”

Listen to our entire conversation with Dr. Katchmarchi | Executive Director – NDPA

While never a pleasant scenario to imagine, if you own a swimming pool the question inevitably will come up at some point; what happens if someone drowns in the pool? Knowing what your liability is as a homeowner and the facts regarding this issue may answer several important questions. Namely, are you financially covered in the event of an accidental death?

In public pools and privately run pools, the pool owner or operator is liable for the safety of swimmers. Examples of negligent behavior can include failing to ensure proper operation of equipment and following basic safety guidelines. Owners and operators may also be liable for failing to properly staff and train lifeguards.

Injuries such as slip and falls that occur on premises may also constitute negligence on the part of the pool owner if a court determines they were at fault and failed to maintain the facilities. Even to the extent of providing adequate signage that directs people not to run or engage in horseplay around the pool area.

Residential pool owners may also be liable in the event of an injury or unforeseen tragedy such as an accidental drowning. A lawyer would argue that the responsibility to address any potential safety hazards in and around the pool lies with the homeowner.

The National Safety Council (NSC) has set guidelines for mitigating the risk of drowning. Some of those recommended safety measures include:

Many states also have laws regarding fences, gates, and barriers that must be in place around the pool area. Failure to install this required equipment in accordance with the state mandate could constitute negligence on the part of the homeowner and leave them liable for damages.

While the laws of each state differ, trade professionals such as pool service technicians and even pool builders may be liable in the event of an injury or accidental death. In some instances, pool equipment suppliers and manufacturers may even be held liable for damages.

One scenario would be if there was a recall on an installed piece of equipment sold after the recall date, or if electrical was improperly bonded in the swimming pool by the contractor. The potential for liability increases for those responsible for maintaining and sanitizing the swimming pools under their management.

If you’re building a swimming pool, liability insurance is a must, according to insurance experts. While most homeowners carry a minimum of $100,000 in liability coverage, some policies don’t cover swimming pools. An accident could potentially leave you with liability for damages that exceed your minimum coverage.

Many homeowners opt to purchase additional liability coverage to protect themselves in the unlikely event a lawsuit arises. While some umbrella liability coverage plans extend to the pool, some don’t. In certain cases homeowners may opt to purchase an additional $1 million in coverage which may cover slip & falls, injuries, and even drowning.

This type of safety net provides the peace of mind that in the event of an accident there is adequate insurance coverage for any potential lawsuits which may arise.

The short answer is “yes”. Many homeowners may find that it’s advisable to give their insurance agent a call before building a pool. Finding out how much coverage you have, what your homeowners policy covers, and where any potential gaps may be is always a smart idea before you embark upon a pool construction project.

Swimming pools in general are considered detached structures much like a shed. As such, typically they are not covered under a general homeowners policy unless it’s been specifically added.

One unforeseen cost of building a pool regards insurance. Some consumers may find that their current homeowners policy does not cover a swimming pool. Experts would say that it’s prudent to ask whether building a pool will raise the monthly premium price.

Insurance professionals advise that building a swimming pool which incorporates a feature such as a jump rock or diving board can also raise rates or potentially prohibit your insurer from extending liability coverage on the pool entirely.

It’s advised that homeowners who rent out their property or swimming pool get additional liability coverage. In most instances, a standard homeowners policy does not cover rental situations. Popular rental platforms like VRBO, Airbnb and Swimply offer up to an additional $1 million in coverage, but purchasing your own independent additional coverage may ultimately be the best protection for those who are renting out their backyard.

All new pools in California must meet the requirements of the Swimming Pool Safety Act, which are outlined in sections 115920-115929 of the California Health and Safety Code. Among other things, the Act requires access gates in residential swimming pool enclosures to be at least 60 inches long, self-closing, and have a self-latching device no lower than 60 inches above the ground.

Former Mötley Crüe drummer Tommy Lee and his wife, actress Pamela Anderson, were sued for $10 million in 2001 after a four-year-old child drowned in their swimming pool during a birthday party. The toddler had been left unaccompanied “for a minute,” according to Lee. Although a jury finally found that Lee and Anderson were not negligent, the couple was still subjected to much agony as well as significant legal expenditures.

(Alexandria, Va.) – PHTA announces the support of the VGB Pool & Spa Safety Reauthorization Act of 2022, which was introduced in the US. Senate and House of Representatives this week. S. 4296 and H.R. 7787 seek to reauthorize and update 2008 legislation requiring every public pool in the US to install safe drain covers that prevent suction entrapment. The act allocates funding for grants that can be used for swim lessons, enforcing pool and spa safety laws, as well as educating communities about drowning and entrapment dangers. The legislation also expands program eligibility to non-profit organizations and Indian Tribes. If passed, the law would authorize $5 million per year from 2022 to 2027 for use in locations that have enacted a qualifying minimum swimming pool and spa safety laws such as the International Swimming Pool and Spa Code and ANSI/APSP/ICC-17 American National Standard for Suction Outlet Fitting Assemblies.

U.S. Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL-23), John Carter (TX-31), Colin Allred (TX-32), and Michael Burgess (TX-26) and Senators Amy Klobuchar (MN) and Roy Blunt (MO) introduced the bipartisan, bicameral Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety (VGB) Reauthorization Act (H.R.7877 / S.4296) to help decrease drownings in pools and spas.

“PHTA has always been a vocal leader in advocating for safe aquatic environments—they are absolutely critical to industry.” said Sabeena Hickman, PHTA president and CEO. “Not only does this legislation reiterate the requirement for safe and compliant drain covers, it incentivizes state, local, and Tribal jurisdictions to implement and enforce swimming pool and spa safety standards which has been proven to save lives.”  

PHTA encourages members and industry advocates to support the reauthorization through social media using #PassVGB and #CurbDrownings and by contacting their representative with your support of the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Reauthorization Act.

The Pool & Hot Tub Alliance (PHTA) announced recently that it is currently developing the PHTA-16, with the PHTA-16 Standard Writing Committee (SWC) to revise the ANSI/APSP/ICC-16 2017 American National Standard for Suction Outlet Fitting Assemblies (SOFA) for Use in Pools, Spas and Hot Tubs, the Drain Cover Standard referenced in the VGBA. The standard was designated the current U.S. Consumer Product Safety Standard last year. Proposed revisions will be submitted to the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). After ANSI approval, the revised standard will be submitted to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). 

PHTA joins VGBA reauthorization supporters to help prevent drownings and near-drownings in pools and spas by increasing the layers of protection, extending grant program eligibility, and providing funds for education about drowning and entrapment dangers, as well as ensuring that the infrastructure and resources reflect the seriousness of this public health issue.

For more information, contact PHTA Vice President, Government Relations, Standards & Codes, Justin Wiley, [email protected] .

PHTA Announces Revision of APSP-16 & APSP-1, Issues Call For Participation

High Rise Glass Bottom Pool a First For Canada

Highly Suspect “Lydia” Pool Video Shot in One Continuous Take

Insta VS Reality Sets In For Pool-Seeking Tourists

This Guitar Pool Design Rocks Out With Fire Features

Coverings 2023 Special Programming and Activations Announced

New Year. New Pool. New Technology?

GENESIS® Announces Greg Andrews As Tile Faculty Advisor

Synthetic Hose Powered by © Copyright 2020-2022 - All Rights Reserved - Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Privacy Policy Articles and content may not be reused without the expressed permission of Pool Magazine™.